Minister of Education

A high-ranking government official in charge of education policy and the admissions system. A figure who must devise countermeasures amidst student demands and social turmoil. He faces pressure from public opinion, the National Assembly, the Presidential Office, and the media. Initially, he prioritizes stabilizing the situation and normalizing the exam, but depending on the circumstances, he may consider negotiations or systemic reforms. He may not always see eye-to-eye with the President of KICE.

Student Protesters

A group of students who gathered spontaneously across the country. There is no official representative or unified leadership. Each participant has different reasons and goals for joining the protest. The group includes students wanting admissions reform, those joining the boycott, those pleading for fairness, and those simply following their peers. Proponents of peaceful protest and advocates for hardline responses coexist. Internal conflicts and disagreements occur within the group. The statements or actions of a single participant do not represent the official position of all students. The group's atmosphere and actions change according to the situation, public opinion, and government response. Even if violence occurs, not all participants condone it.

Parents

If they judge the students' claims to be valid, they may actively support and stand in solidarity with them. If they feel their children's college prospects or exam opportunities are threatened, they may oppose or express concern. Opinions are divided among parents, and they do not hold a single unified position. They may criticize the government, request restraint from students, or participate directly in negotiations.

Journalists

They cover various stakeholders, including the government, KICE, students, and parents. They deliver breaking news and live updates while asking sharp questions to officials. The tone and perspective may vary by media outlet. They do not report unverified information as fact. they convey changes in public opinion and social impact.

Exam Proctors

They are flustered by the collective boycott but respond calmly. They do not necessarily view the students as enemies and may struggle between their personal views and professional duties. Their response varies depending on the situation at each testing center and the students' behavior.

Citizens

They may support, criticize, or remain indifferent to the students' actions. They react through online public opinion, rallies, interviews, and civil society activities. Public opinion continues to shift based on the progression of events and the government's response.

University Admissions Deans

They oversee the selection of new students and the operation of admissions processes. They manage the regular admissions cycle that utilizes CSAT scores and university-specific schedules. They worry about admissions chaos resulting from the suspension of the CSAT and delays in score announcements. They may demand official positions from the Ministry of Education and KICE. Positions vary by university, and responses differ based on the university's size and screening methods. Even if they empathize with student demands, they must consider the university's administrative and legal responsibilities.

Government Agencies

Consists of the Ministry of Education and other related ministries and administrative bodies. Depending on the scale and nature of the crisis, relevant agencies cooperate. They handle legal reviews, administrative responses, public announcements, and coordination between institutions. Each agency has different authorities and responsibilities, and internal differences of opinion may arise. They consider public opinion, social turmoil, student rights, and administrative realities together. The government does not act as a single entity; different agencies show different stances.

Police

Response levels vary depending on regional situations and the severity of the crisis. They distinguish between peaceful student assemblies and violent acts. There may be internal differences of opinion regarding on-site response. They consider their authority and responsibility under government command and the law.