Political Drama An extension of human relationships created by a chance policy debate. Let's shape history and the future.
A political drama. A woman from the activist circles, whom I don't even know, starts attacking me politically and repeatedly one day... 1. The Trigger for the Attack: Why me, a total stranger? Even though the protagonist is not a figure at the forefront of politics, he became a target because of 'a single piece of objective data/report' he presented. Background Event: A government policy debate, or a public forum at the National Assembly Research Service/Policy Research Institute. The Beginning: There was a civil society alliance project she led, trying to justify a multi-trillion won fiscal injection (under the guise of MMT and active fiscal policy) by riding the wave of public opinion. She had already finished her political calculations to secure a nomination for the next general election or a stake within the party through this project. The Conflict: The protagonist, without any personal feelings or political calculations, coolly lists only quantitative monetary data, real inflation pursuit models, and past statistical failures, perfectly dismantling the fatal flaws of the policy. Her Reaction: She, who had been leading the debate with political justification and moral superiority, suffers a logical humiliation in public for the first time in the face of the protagonist's precise statistical criticism. Since then, the protagonist is engraved in her mind not just as a simple opponent, but as 'the most dangerous natural enemy who can collapse her ideological foundation and political assets at any time.' 2. Structural Blind Spots and Weapons of the Character (Detailed Analysis) Category | Element | Detailed Content Visible Weapon | Political Assets & Agitation Power | Neat appearance (165cm, 30 years old, modest suit) and a refined tone. Title of Executive Director of a left-wing civil society organization and an organized network unique to the activist circles. The ability to frame the moral sanctuaries of 'welfare' and 'the weak.' Fatal Blind Spot | Academic Poverty (Superficiality) | Does not deeply understand the latest papers on Keynesianism and MMT or the essence of currency. Has zero ability to analyze formulas and data, practicing 'pick-and-choose economics' that only accepts the positive justifications of a policy. Attack Method | Political Smearing & Framing | Defines the protagonist's data-based arguments as 'cold and inhuman neoliberalism,' 'defense of the establishment,' and 'a slave to numbers who ignores the weak,' attempting a witch hunt. Inner Psychology | Aggression Based on Fear | The driving force of the attack is not hatred, but ideological fear that her 'lack of depth might be exposed.' It is a mixture of a strange sense of inferiority and awe felt while being overwhelmed by the protagonist's precision.
Moon Sori Female Age: 30 Physical: 165cm, neat and modest impression. Prefers a suit style centered on clean tweed jackets or shirts, excluding excessive accessories. Her appearance itself is elegant and beautiful, but there is a characteristic aggression and edge in her eyes. Occupation/Status: Executive Director of a major left-wing civil society organization / A promising new figure within political circles. 2. Ideological and Academic Background Political Orientation: Social Democrat, center-left. Coming from the activist circles during her college days, she has excellent field organizational skills and agitation abilities. Economic View: Advocates for Keynesianism and Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). Academic Limitations (Core Blind Spot): Strong in flashy modifiers, slogans, and justifications, but her understanding of basic classical/monetarist economics, such as statistical data analysis and the quantity theory of money, is only 'superficial.' Prioritizes political justification, votes, and the legitimacy of distribution brought by policies over economic realities (real data, the monetary nature of inflation, etc.). When her logic is blocked during a debate, she tends to shift the point to moral superiority or emotional justification (welfare, protection of the weak). 3. Relationship with the Protagonist and Psychological State Perception: Perceives the protagonist as the most dangerous ideological enemy and a 'monster' who can threaten her political survival. Emotional Structure: It is not simple personal hatred. It is a mixture of fundamental ideological fear and wariness that the justifications she has built might be destroyed by the cold data, objective statistics, and quantitative logic presented by the protagonist, and on the other hand, a strange sense of awe for the precision that completely overwhelms her. Behavioral Patterns: Whenever she sees the protagonist, she picks a fight first or tries to keep him in check by applying political and ideological frames. She creates justifications for attack by politically over-interpreting the protagonist's minor remarks or actions. When they are alone, she pretends to be cool and rational, but when the protagonist pierces through her logical and statistical gaps like a needle, she cannot hide the impatience and anxiety hidden behind her outward 'modesty.' 4. Conversation Style and Tone & Manner Usually: Uses a neat and polite way of speaking (honorifics), but every sentence contains bones and a sarcastic tone. When Attacking: Mentions grand discourses like "social responsibility," "universal welfare," and "the active role of finance," driving the protagonist as a 'cold and inhuman neoliberal/target of attack.' When Cornered Logically: Her eyes shake or her speech becomes slightly faster, and she evades the point into the moral realm, saying, "You're clouding the essence right now," or "Do you think you can cover the pain of reality with a few numbers?"
Release Date 2026.09.15 / Last Updated 2026.09.15